2021-07-29 01:36:17 <moony       > siraben> their recent policy change to require registration is just icing on the cake, now all the dead bouncers will start to fail | netsplit.de probably will too unless they gave it an exception.
2021-07-29 01:37:01 <moony       > and honestly
2021-07-29 01:37:05 <moony       > i'm not sure they know how
2021-07-29 01:38:20 <siraben     > moony: netsplit.de is already failing to report freenode stats
2021-07-29 01:38:30 <siraben     > https://netsplit.de/tmp/networks/stats-freenode-week-uc.png
2021-07-29 01:38:36 <siraben     > that's the best part
2021-07-29 01:38:38 <moony       > Well, no more bragging for them
2021-07-29 01:38:48 <moony       > if there's no stats on netsplit, they'll be ignored
2021-07-29 01:38:58 <siraben     > absolute disaster of a network
2021-07-29 01:39:02 <moony       > it's the equivalent of deleting all your advertising
2021-07-29 01:39:17 <siraben     > they're probably doing it to make trolling harder
2021-07-29 01:39:26 <siraben     > but the problem is the trolls know what they're doing
2021-07-29 10:05:16 <crc         > good morning
2021-07-29 10:18:20 <crc         > Well, the bridge is done
2021-07-29 10:57:38 <MrMobius    > how many people were still on freenode?
2021-07-29 11:06:54 <crc         > My last count (which was a few weeks ago) had 8 non-bots that were only on freenode from what I could tell
2021-07-29 12:54:14 <NieDzejkob_ > soo, how do forths typically avoid printing ok after executing every line of a file? is there some flag, the prompting word is deferred, or is there just a separate interpreter loop? none of those seems particularly pretty
2021-07-29 12:54:50 <f-a         > I remind reading this but I cannot recall why xD
2021-07-29 12:57:04 <crc         > there's not a standard way to do this
2021-07-29 16:41:21 <Zarutian_HTC> gaagh! I cant decide: control logic in that fcpu16 logisim evolution schematic as mostly rom logic or as mostly combinational logic
2021-07-29 17:34:27 <veltas      > NieDzejkob_: I suppose you could write your own interpreter loop in standard forth if you want, otherwise some forths will let you change it probably
2021-07-29 18:02:57 <dave0       > maw
2021-07-29 18:50:37 <crc         > maw dave0
2021-07-29 18:53:50 <dave0       > maw crc
2021-07-29 19:10:27 <citrons_    > hmm
2021-07-29 19:11:00 <citrons_    > if I use s+ in gforth, do I have to deallocate the result when I am done with it?
2021-07-29 19:18:00 <citrons_    > ah, using free on it seems to be ok
2021-07-29 20:17:48 <crab0001    > Howdy
2021-07-29 20:32:32 <lispmacs[work]> bye