2022-01-01 06:18:00 <neurosys_   > joe9: Which Forth is the do-loop code from?
2022-01-01 06:56:33 <neurosys_   > https://izzys.casa/2021/12/wrapping-up-2021/
2022-01-01 06:57:28 <neurosys_   > I wonder what they would think of Forth, or why don't they design their language.
2022-01-01 07:00:53 <veltas      > Without trying to be rude, it does read like they have a personality disorder
2022-01-01 07:04:06 <veltas      > I think they should accept committees are highly incapable but also lend the kind of weight needed to create a standard.
2022-01-01 07:04:48 <veltas      > It's better to have a slowly deteriating standard than no standard
2022-01-01 07:10:25 <veltas      > It's good they've found higher level languages to play with, probably FORTH would not be healthy for them right now
2022-01-01 08:01:02 <joe9        > does anyone know the guy who wrote this? https://izzys.casa/2021/12/wrapping-up-2021/
2022-01-01 08:01:31 <joe9        > he needs to see this: http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/ (?)
2022-01-01 12:17:54 <imode       > that person is uh.. they need therapy and a life.
2022-01-01 12:21:19 <f-a         > we alldo
2022-01-01 14:09:06 <psf         > OCPD is no joke, I hope they find peace.
2022-01-01 17:17:45 <swissChili  > Is there a standard forth word for the bottom of the stack? That is, the address of the top of the stack when the system first starts? I can't find anything looking over the standard
2022-01-01 17:39:12 <joe9        > s0
2022-01-01 17:39:15 <joe9        > ?
2022-01-01 17:49:04 <swissChili  > Hmm, I searched that on forth-standard.org and nothing came up, so I thought I was crazy
2022-01-01 17:49:08 <swissChili  > thanks
2022-01-01 17:53:14 <crc         > I've seen s0 used, but this isn't standardized.
2022-01-01 17:54:42 <crc         > (stacks may not exist in addressable memory, so standardizing a word to provide an address for it is outside the scope of the ans standard)