2022-01-09 13:08:31 someone reinvented threaded code https://github.com/wasm3/wasm3/blob/main/docs/Interpreter.md 2022-01-09 16:55:03 i am looking for a forth implementation that allows me to produce static binaries for x86, and for arm, anything you recommend? 2022-01-09 16:55:18 I found 4th, but was wondering if there are others. 2022-01-09 17:13:20 https://github.com/mark4th x4 and t4 both do this IIRC 2022-01-09 17:21:10 crc, thanks, looking at it now :) 2022-01-09 17:51:06 crc, looks nice, but it doesn't seem to generate static binaries 2022-01-09 20:31:28 crc, oh yes, I can see now how to use it to generate static files; it looks really nice; thanks for the tip! any other tips are appreciate it as I am trying to get an overview of the landscape of available forths that can generate static binaries. Thanks! 2022-01-09 20:47:43 a88, just curious, what are you trying to do? forths tend to be architecture specific 2022-01-09 20:50:11 MrMobius, yes, I just need it to run on x86 and on arm 2022-01-09 20:51:39 the mark4th that crc pointed out looks nice; but I am a little surprised (the author seems very careful) that it is not printing the right date/time 2022-01-09 20:51:53 ( the year is 2122 :) ) 2022-01-09 21:01:44 the thing is if youre working with a forth written in assembly, you may end up adjusting your words a little to fit the underlying architecture better 2022-01-09 21:28:00 I see, but the author provides both an x64 version and an arm version (t4) claiming the same forth source should work the same on both versions 2022-01-09 21:28:32 I think his claim is right, since most of his library (heavily used) is just forth (not assembly) 2022-01-09 21:29:09 (by heavily used I mean that his system depends on the library whether on x86 or arm) 2022-01-09 21:50:08 im sure it is if that's what he offers. i was just mentioning that to explain why it seems there arent many cross platform forths 2022-01-09 22:14:40 ah I see