2022-03-19 17:48:52 <KipIngram   > You know, this may be old news for some of you, because it's kind of obvious, but I'd never actually landed on it explicitly before.  "0 >in !" sends interpretation back to the start of the line.
2022-03-19 17:49:04 <KipIngram   > That raises some interesting possibilities for looping interpretively.
2022-03-19 17:49:27 <eris[m]     > huh
2022-03-19 17:49:29 <KipIngram   > Told you it was obvious.  :-)
2022-03-19 17:49:30 <eris[m]     > thats Interesting
2022-03-19 17:49:34 <KipIngram   > It is.
2022-03-19 17:49:55 <KipIngram   > I tested it (though I had no doubt, really).  Of course you'd need some way of terminating the iteration.
2022-03-19 17:50:17 <KipIngram   > I'm not sure if it would wind up being particularly useful, but it bears thinking on.
2022-03-19 17:51:40 <KipIngram   > We pull words out of whatever buffer the input is coming from, but nothing happens that changes any of it.
2022-03-19 17:52:50 <KipIngram   > One might argue that such changes would be innocuous for keyboard input - the tib is generally one-time use.  But it'd be bad for text being loaded from a block buffer to be changed.  Might inadvertently get written back out.