2024-10-29 00:07:35 <zelgomer    > veltas: so in other words, you just define words willy-nilly and then scoop them into a new vocabulary after the fact? i think i like that...
2024-10-29 01:32:23 <KipIngram   > If you want to cross compile you need CURRENT I think.  Otherwise yeah, you could probably do without it.
2024-10-29 07:58:28 <veltas      > Yeah that's it.  Seems to be more minimal/simple implementation
2024-10-29 07:59:06 <veltas      > Cross compiler I would write a special interpreter/compiler loop for regardless
2024-10-29 21:13:45 <KipIngram   > I used to wring my hands over whether or not to have the CURRENT vocabulary in the search order, explicitly.  I eventually decided not to.  Usually  you get it anyway, because you've just put that voc in the search order before you said DEFINITIONS - you have to explicitly remove it to get it out.  But I decided that there might be some corner cases where you didn't want it, or didn't want it
2024-10-29 21:13:47 <KipIngram   > first, or whatever.