2024-12-09 22:23:15 <veltas      > zelgomer: I have tried this in gforth https://termbin.com/ajle
2024-12-09 22:23:50 <veltas      > And I think I prefer this to working with vocabs/wordlists most of the time, for hiding 'private' stuff; this is much easier
2024-12-09 22:28:59 <zelgomer    > makes sense. KISS
2024-12-09 22:29:39 <zelgomer    > how do you use it if you immediately unlink UNLINK and !! though? :)
2024-12-09 22:48:24 <veltas      > It's [FROM,TO)
2024-12-09 22:48:55 <veltas      > So !! is removed and UNLINK is retained
2024-12-09 22:49:11 <zelgomer    > oh of course
2024-12-09 22:54:19 <veltas      > KipIngram maybe you'll find interesting as well https://termbin.com/ajle
2024-12-09 23:31:45 <veltas      > Interesting and it doesn't work, I guess because gforth uses a hash table as well for lookup?
2024-12-09 23:31:59 <veltas      > Removes from WORDS but not from normal lookup
2024-12-09 23:32:42 <zelgomer    > i was going to say, it seems like you're just making an assumption that the link field is at the beginning of the header
2024-12-09 23:32:58 <zelgomer    > but i didn't because i don't know anything about gforth and maybe that's true
2024-12-09 23:37:09 <veltas      > It is at the beginning of the header
2024-12-09 23:37:28 <zelgomer    > ok
2024-12-09 23:37:34 <veltas      > And it removes it from WORDS printout, but still gets found by interpreter
2024-12-09 23:37:42 <zelgomer    > lol
2024-12-09 23:37:51 <veltas      > Because gforth adds hash tables for lookup on top of dictionary links
2024-12-09 23:37:56 <veltas      > For speed
2024-12-09 23:38:06 <zelgomer    > that sounds unnecessarily complicated
2024-12-09 23:38:16 <veltas      > I'm just trying to find out how to remove from hash as well
2024-12-09 23:38:29 <veltas      > Yeah I agree
2024-12-09 23:51:45 <veltas      > Okay CURRENT @ REHASHALL fixes this
2024-12-09 23:51:58 <veltas      > And seems to be allowed in 0.7.3 and latest snapshot
2024-12-09 23:53:40 <veltas      > https://termbin.com/9qr6