2025-02-21 00:02:16 I mean you look at the roman empire, they had a few good emperors and a lot of bad emperors. But a lot of those bad emperors were never really in charge anyway. 2025-02-21 00:02:20 Got to look out for those bad emperors that *are* in charge 2025-02-21 00:03:43 How do you know not to do something again if you don't know how bad it went the last time it was tried? 2025-02-21 00:04:55 https://thrig.me/tmp/history.jpg 2025-02-21 00:05:25 True that 2025-02-21 00:05:38 Oh man. Yeah. 2025-02-21 00:05:54 At least the ones that don't know get to be excited on the way in. 2025-02-21 00:20:57 But how close are we to AGI? Does anyone here know a lot about AI research? 2025-02-21 00:26:42 someone pinned it to 100 billion in profits, which seems much in the line of "AI as a term invented to get money" 2025-02-21 00:40:20 AGI requires more than a word pattern guesser 2025-02-21 00:41:00 when you think, your prefrontal cortex imagines, it plays games, it simulates several realities and then tells you what's going to happen, you then translate that into words 2025-02-21 00:41:28 LLMs are text based, they don't know what a picture is, they don't know what graphics are 2025-02-21 03:07:14 Also, the way you know how to simulate those realities is by having operated in the world - moved your body around, interacted with things, etc. - that's how you know how these simulations are likely to go. So it may be that real intelligence requires that as well. 2025-02-21 04:03:58 that's a physics thing then 2025-02-21 04:04:36 which is a part of the simulated game thing 2025-02-21 04:45:11 Hello! Saw the posting on lemmy about the gforth bot! 2025-02-21 04:45:28 Now... to learn some gforth :p 2025-02-21 04:45:43 !gforth 2025-02-21 04:52:22 Uhm... !gforth .s 2025-02-21 05:45:53 and he gone 2025-02-21 05:45:58 shame, shame 2025-02-21 06:20:51 !gforth .s 2025-02-21 06:20:52 <0> 2025-02-21 06:21:41 nmz-: probably nobody knows what AGI requires because probably nobody has built one yet 2025-02-21 06:22:28 airplanes don't have to flap their wings 2025-02-21 08:24:30 xentrac: yeah... but at least I can tell via how I think 2025-02-21 09:33:44 I'd expect experts to have predictions for how much longer it will take, with a lot of variability 2025-02-21 09:34:05 Hard to find experts and not just hype monsters, though 2025-02-21 09:45:01 I'm going to have to find a project to do in konilo 2025-02-21 09:45:08 Probably best way to learn it 2025-02-21 12:19:27 nmz-: if introspection were sufficient to understand the mind, we'd have had AGI about 60 years ago 2025-02-21 12:20:16 also much less debate about philosophy and psychology 2025-02-21 19:13:29 !gforth 1 . 2025-02-21 19:13:30 1 2025-02-21 19:37:14 !gforth 1 2 swap 2025-02-21 19:37:16 !gforth 1 2 swap .s 2025-02-21 19:37:17 <2> 2 1 2025-02-21 19:43:57 !gforth version-string type 2025-02-21 19:43:58 0.7.3 2025-02-21 20:05:12 !gforth : testelse if 1 else 2 else 3 else 4 then ; 1 testelse . . 0 testelse . . 2025-02-21 20:05:12 3 1 4 2 2025-02-21 20:05:37 !gforth : testelse if 1 else 2 else 3 else 4 then ; 1 testelse . . 124 emit 0 testelse . . 2025-02-21 20:05:38 3 1 |4 2 2025-02-21 20:08:31 (this behavior is required by the Forth standard, which is hosted on the same web server as the GForth documentation because of the large overlap in contributors) 2025-02-21 20:19:36 yes, it was discussed some weeks ago I believe 2025-02-21 20:20:30 though the extra info about the contributors overlay is new :) 2025-02-21 20:20:37 to me at least 2025-02-21 20:20:56 overlap* 2025-02-21 20:23:05 I noticed this when the server went down for a few days recently 2025-02-21 21:51:10 !gforth 1 2 + . 2025-02-21 21:51:11 3 2025-02-21 21:55:20 !gforth . . . 2025-02-21 22:00:51 !gforth words 2025-02-21 22:00:54 https://0x0.st/8b2g.txt 2025-02-21 22:49:47 The real standard https://www.iso.org/standard/26479.html