2025-04-01 00:34:37 <cleobuline  > mforth:  " une fée dans un paysage enchanté " IMAGE
2025-04-01 00:34:53 <mforth      > https://tinyurl.com/22aadfol
2025-04-01 00:35:55 <cleobuline  > a touch of modernism in an old school program :)
2025-04-01 00:53:38 <cleobuline  > mforth:  " un groupe de zombies dans un paysage post apocalyptique " IMAGE
2025-04-01 00:53:52 <mforth      > https://tinyurl.com/28wepnyo
2025-04-01 04:40:07 <cleobuline  > mforth:  " un groupe de zombies dans un paysage post apocalyptique " IMAGE
2025-04-01 04:40:19 <mforth      > https://tinyurl.com/29usqjhu
2025-04-01 05:33:32 <nmz         > what's the fastest forth?
2025-04-01 05:34:05 <nmz         > if I wanna number crunch, you'd think something written in assembly would beat a JIT
2025-04-01 05:34:28 <cleobuline  > yes
2025-04-01 05:38:09 <cleobuline  > forth:  " une fée dans un paysage enchanté " IMAGE
2025-04-01 05:38:56 <cleobuline  > mforth:  " une fée dans un paysage enchanté " IMAGE
2025-04-01 05:39:11 <mforth      > https://tinyurl.com/2xttv9ef
2025-04-01 05:41:32 <nmz         > cleobuline: like?
2025-04-01 05:41:47 <cleobuline  > like what ?
2025-04-01 05:42:01 <nmz         > you said yes to my question or no?
2025-04-01 05:44:23 <cleobuline  > do you plan to write an assebly forth ?
2025-04-01 05:50:52 <nmz         > no
2025-04-01 05:51:12 <nmz         > I was whining about forth being slower than C and even JIT languages and someone mentioned vfx forth being the fastest forth, but since I can't even download it, I was wondering what everyone thinks
2025-04-01 08:27:16 <veltas      > nmz: If you want to number crunch, then the fastest language is usually literally anything that lets you write SIMD instructions or intrinsics, and spawn multiple threads
2025-04-01 08:27:43 <veltas      > If it's really not parallelisable then usually it's still whatever lets you write inline assembly
2025-04-01 08:27:52 <veltas      > So assembler, C, Rust, Forth, etc
2025-04-01 08:28:35 <veltas      > But if that's not feasible for most of the work, then you're probably better off with C, which has a more mathsy syntax anyway and a lot more compiler effort behind it
2025-04-01 08:29:05 <veltas      > Forth is that tradeoff where having a smaller implementation is desirable, but obviously that means you won't get the fastest code in all situations
2025-04-01 13:52:36 <cleobuline  > mforth:   " un fée dans un paysage enchanté " IMAGE
2025-04-01 13:52:49 <mforth      > https://tinyurl.com/2b6xf95h
2025-04-01 13:53:30 <xentrac     > it went a bit overboard with the fairy
2025-04-01 13:54:19 <cleobuline  > the magic forth :)
2025-04-01 13:54:25 <xentrac     > I count onze fées but I might be missing some
2025-04-01 13:55:18 <cleobuline  > i like fairys
2025-04-01 13:57:06 <cleobuline  >  xentrac only 3 fairys
2025-04-01 13:57:44 <cleobuline  > mforth:   " un monstre horrible avec des grandes dents des gros yeux et plein de poils " IMAGE
2025-04-01 13:57:53 <mforth      > https://tinyurl.com/22y5e93t
2025-04-01 13:58:17 <cleobuline  > :)
2025-04-01 13:58:53 <cleobuline  > don't  take lsd with this bot , use at your own risks !
2025-04-01 14:21:41 <xentrac     > I think I should use this image as a selfie on dating sites
2025-04-01 15:27:26 <cleobuline  > haha
2025-04-01 18:20:31 <cleobuline  > mforth:  WORDS
2025-04-01 18:20:31 <mforth      > USERNAME .S . + - * / MOD DUP DROP SWAP OVER ROT >R R> R@ = < > AND OR NOT XOR & | ^ ~ << >> CR EMIT VARIABLE @ ! +! DO LOOP I WORDS LOAD CREATE ALLOT ." CLOCK BEGIN WHILE REPEAT AGAIN SQRT UNLOOP +LOOP PICK CLEAR-STACK PRINT NUM-TO-BIN PRIME? FORGET STRING " 2DROP IMAGE TEMP-IMAGE
2025-04-01 18:20:53 <cleobuline  > new : IMAGE and TEMP-IMAGE
2025-04-01 22:45:59 <pgimeno     > I was thinking that with a stack of arbitrary precision numbers, you don't need a string stack - you just need to interpret numbers as strings
2025-04-01 23:05:20 <veltas      > Yeah you don't even need a stack, you can just encode everything in one number
2025-04-01 23:05:47 <veltas      > But not much point
2025-04-01 23:35:59 <veqq        > How would you implement a concatenative language in Forth, just conceptually
2025-04-01 23:59:26 <crc         > veqq: is forth not already concatenative?