00:00:25
##forth
<M-Sci>
Yes, it's unbearable, but it wouldn't be C otherwise.
00:06:53
##forth
<xentrac>
?
01:32:08
##forth
<MrMobius>
I got kicked from #c for asking the bot something more than 3 times
01:32:41
##forth
<MrMobius>
they only want you to use it to illustrate something in a conversation not test something youre curious about
01:33:27
##forth
<xentrac>
hopefully ##forth never falls to that level
01:57:37
##forth
<KipIngram>
I've often found it remarkable how stuffy and, honestly, downright rude people of influence in some of the open source communities are.
01:58:03
##forth
<MrMobius>
it's pretty weird
01:59:03
##forth
<MrMobius>
I got corrected in #linux or another channel for using an abbreviation like "np" or something along those lines since it's against the channel terms
01:59:23
##forth
<KipIngram>
Almost as though by slamming someone they can show how superior they are. And it doesn't really matter what the slam is; it could be technical criticism, "community rules" criticism, whatever.
02:01:27
##forth
<MrMobius>
exactly
02:05:03
##forth
<crc>
a quick rfc: for the logs I publish on forth.chat, would anyone prefer copies that filter out (most of) the bot output?
02:20:46
##forth
<KipIngram>
Either way is fine with me, crc.
02:21:34
##forth
<KipIngram>
MrMobius: At one point many years ago I tried to be somewhat active on a couple of the big sites, but after seen how common what I described above was I largely lost interest.
03:06:28
##forth
<wolfdog>
i feel like logs should have bot input, because what happens if someone uses a bot to show an example of something during a conversation and the logs filter that bot output? now there's an important part of said conversation missing
03:06:37
##forth
<wolfdog>
s/bot input/bot output/
03:07:51
##forth
<wolfdog>
my solution would be probably along the lines of notating in the HTML markup which lines are bot output, and then a script can collapse them and allow an user to show the
03:07:53
##forth
<wolfdog>
them*
03:31:05
##forth
<xentrac>
I think the question is whether to have versions without, not whether to have versions with
04:08:27
##forth
<crc>
just to clarify, I'm asking about adding additional copies without bot stuff as an option, the full logs would still contain everything
04:39:54
##forth
<wolfdog>
ahh
04:40:11
##forth
<wolfdog>
somehow i managed to skip the word "copies" in your message ^^"
16:04:42
##forth
<cleobuline>
bon
19:44:36
##forth
<user51>
crc: against, just keep it (annoyingly) simple.
19:47:53
##forth
<user51>
xentrac: I like the PT vids but also hate it because I don't have a rainforest nearby.
19:49:34
##forth
<user51>
I've occasionally considered some sort of nature retreat but I don't really have the skills for that. Good chance it'll get old on the third day, too.
20:10:53
##forth
<cleobuline>
forthBot: : REVERSE 1 DO I ROLL LOOP ;
20:11:03
##forth
<cleobuline>
forthBot: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7 REVERSE .S
20:11:03
##forth
<forthBot>
<7> 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
20:15:14
##forth
<cleobuline>
nice ...
20:32:28
##forth
<cleobuline>
forthBot: : REVERSE DUP 2 < IF DROP EXIT THEN 1 DO I ROLL LOOP ;
20:32:35
##forth
<cleobuline>
bettter
20:43:52
##forth
<cleobuline>
forth: 0 REVERSE .S
20:44:02
##forth
<cleobuline>
forthBot: 0 REVERSE .S
20:44:02
##forth
<forthBot>
<7> 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
20:44:17
##forth
<cleobuline>
forthBot: 7 REVERSE .S
20:44:17
##forth
<forthBot>
<7> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
20:47:02
##forth
<cleobuline>
forthBot: 3 REVERSE .S
20:47:02
##forth
<forthBot>
<7> 1 2 3 4 7 6 5
20:48:33
##forth
<cleobuline>
marvelous !
20:53:27
##forth
<cleobuline>
forthBot: 3 REVERSE .S
20:53:28
##forth
<forthBot>
<7> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
22:53:28
##forth
<forthBot>
Environment for cleobuline inactive, freeing...
23:05:32
##forth
<xentrac>
user51: it's easier when you aren't in a rainforest I think